S v takaendesa 1972
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2014/38.pdf WebJan 12, 2024 · "Enquiring of the Lord," was one King David's secret behind his dominant successes and unfading legacy. This song therefore calls us to always enquire of the...
S v takaendesa 1972
Did you know?
WebJun 24, 2016 · Recusal Practice Note 6 of 2016 (10 May 2016) 1. RECUSAL (PRACTICE NOTE 6 OF 2016) 1. Judicial disqualification, also referred to as recusal, refers to the act of abstaining from participation in an official action such as a legal proceeding due to a conflict of interest of the presiding court official or administrative officer1. Web15 S v Takaendesa 1972 (4) SA 72 (RAD). 16 Amalgated Packaging Industries v Hutt 1975 (4) 943 (A). 17 Johannesburg City Council v Arumugan 1961 (3) SA 748 (W).
Web(messenger of the Magistrate’s Court, Durban v Pillay). In Bezuidenhout v AA Mutual Insurance Association Ltd, for example, the court found that “shall” is a strong indication that the provision is peremptory. 7. In S v Takaendesa this principle was explained as follows: “where a statute prohibits the doing of something unless something WebIn summary, the purpose of the rules of construction is to discover the intention of the law-giver, and such intention should be deduced from the actual words used by the legislating body, its general plan and its objects (Lion Match Company Limited v Wessels 1946 OPD 376 at 380; S v Takaendesa 1972(4) SA 72 (RA); Van Heerden v Queen s Hotel ...
WebIn S v. Takaendesa 1972 (1) RLR 162, Beadle CJ referred to “the elementary rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and cited, with approval, ... Thus, in S v. Masiriva 1990 (1) ZLR 373, where the court was called upon to interpret section 46(4) of the Road Traffic Act ... WebHe relied on S v Chogugudza 1996 (1) ZLR 28 (S) where the following appears at p30 E-F): “… before the State could rely on the presumption in s 15 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, it would have to show: ... See Maxwell on Interpretation of Statutes 12 ed at p 28, quoted by BEADLE CJ in S v Takaendesa 1972(4) SA 72 (RA) at 75 G; 1972 ...
WebJul 27, 2024 · The judge said” In S v Takaendesa 1972 (1) ZLR 162 BEADLE CJ (as he then was) referred to “the” elementary (golden) rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and …
WebIn S v Mthethwa 1972(3) SA 766 (A) at 768A the Court said the following: ‘Because of the fallibility of human observation, evidence of identification is approached by the Courts with some caution. It is not enough for the identifying witness to be honest: The reliability of his observation must also be tested. This byd song pro/plusWebJul 27, 2024 · The judge said” In S v Takaendesa 1972 (1) ZLR 162 BEADLE CJ (as he then was) referred to “the” elementary (golden) rules on the interpretation of statutes”, and … byd song pro plusWebr"he Vagrancy Amendment Act, 51 of 1972, breathes new life into the old Chapter 49. The first breath is by way of additional defini· tions of "vagrant". The new definition in s.2(bl) reads "any person who is idle or disorderly". In practice it will probably be found that this definition is not very helpful. The law dictionaries are full of byd sound